Ch.4 Q2

Condon, Allenhynek, and Paynter each had different arguments and evidence to support their “theories” on the existence of UFO’s. Allenhynek believed that there was a possibility of the existence of UFO’s but he stated that there should be more studies and research to prove his belief. Paynter says, unlike Condon and Allenhynek, he is uncertain of the existence of UFO’s.  All three of the experts believe in further research of the matter, but Paynter also turns to reasoning and facts proving the existence or non-existence of UFO’s. Condon did not really support or provide evidence to the existence of UFO’s but he stated that it would be enjoyable to research this. All three of the experts had their thoughts on UFO’s but I have to agree with Paynter’s view. I admired his non-biased judgment in this matter and turning to facts, evidence and a line of reasoning in proving the existence of UFO’s.